Volume 12, Issue 23 (4-2021)                   J Watershed Manage Res 2021, 12(23): 285-295 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Norouzi H, Karimi V, Bazargan J, Hemmati H. (2021). Different types of Optimizing the Parameters of Hydrological Routing Methods using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm for Flood Routing in the Karun River. J Watershed Manage Res. 12(23), 285-295. doi:10.52547/jwmr.12.23.285
URL: http://jwmr.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-1095-en.html
1- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Zanjan University
2- Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran
Abstract:   (3136 Views)
Optimizing the parameters of hydrological routing methods has a special place in increasing the accuracy of estimating outflow hydrograph and also calculating the peak area of flood hydrograph in engineering works. In the present study, since the range of changes in the inflow of the third flood (computational flood) is between the range of changes of the inflow of the first and second floods (base floods), For this reason, in order to increase the flood routing accuracy by using hydrological routing methods (linear Musking method, Working values, convex and modified Att-Kin), instead of using the parameters (X, K, ∆t) of a baseline flood, the arithmetic mean and the geometric of the two baseline flood parameters is discussed in 8 different modes using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In other words, the use of all 8 modes presented in the present study has increased the accuracy of hydrological routing methods in estimating the peak area of flood hydrographs between Mollasani (upstream) and Ahwaz (downstream) hydrometric stations of the Karun River. Thus, in the best case presented in the present study (mode 8), the mean relative error of the computational flood peak area relative to the conditions in which the first baseline flood is used alone, for the mentioned methods are 66, 66, 25 and 18%, respectively, and in conditions When the second baseline flood is used alone, it has improved by 43, 43, 4 and 9%, respectively.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1448 kb]   (740 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: بلايای طبيعی (سيل، خشکسالی و حرکت های توده ای)
Received: 2020/06/21 | Accepted: 2020/09/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Watershed Management Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb