1. An, S., H. Ku and P.Y. Julien. 2015. Numerical modelling of local scour caused by submerged jets. Maejo International journal of Science and Technology, 9(3): 328 pp.
2. Barkdoll, B.D., R. Ettema and A.J. Odgaard. 1999. Sediment control at lateral diversions: limits and enhancements to vane use. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 125(8): 862-870 pp. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:8(862)]
3. Choufu, L., S. Abbasi, H. Pourshahbaz, P. Taghvaei and S. Tfwala. 2019. Investigation of Flow, Erosion, and Sedimentation Pattern around Varied Groynes under Different Hydraulic and Geometric Conditions: A Numerical Study. Water, 11(2): 235 pp. [
DOI:10.3390/w11020235]
4. Duan, J.G., L. He, X. Fu and Q. Wang. 2009. Mean flow and turbulence around experimental spur dike. Advances in Water Resources, 32(12): 1717-1725. [
DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.09.004]
5. Farzin, S., H. Karami, R. Hajiabadi, S. Nayyer, S.M. Hamzeh Ziabari. 2019. Evaluating the Effect of Various Parameters of Protective Spur Dike on Scour Depth Reduction using Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 10(19): 194-203 (In Persian). [
DOI:10.29252/jwmr.10.19.194]
6. Gohari, S., S.A. Ayyoubzadeh, M. Ghodsian and N.S. SALEHI. 2011. Flow Pattern at Lateral Intake Using a Spur Dike and Submerged Vanes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (Iran), 11(4): 1-18.
7. Hasegawa, Y., H. Nakagawa, H. Takebayashi and K. Kawaike. 2020. Three-Dimensional Flow Characteristics in Slit-Type Permeable Spur Dike Fields: Efficacy in Riverbank Protection. Water, 12(4): 964 p. [
DOI:10.3390/w12040964]
8. Ingle, R.N. and A.M. Mahankal. 1990. Discussion of "Division of flow in short open channel branches" by amruthur S. ramamurthy and mysore G. satish (april, 1988, vol. 114, no. 4). Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 116(2): 289-291. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:2(289.2)]
9. Jeon, J., J.Y. Lee and S. Kang. 2018. Experimental investigation of three‐dimensional flow structure and turbulent flow mechanisms around a nonsubmerged spur dike with a low length‐to‐depth ratio. Water Resources Research, 54(5): 3530-3556 p. [
DOI:10.1029/2017WR021582]
10. Karami, H., H. Basser, A. Ardeshir and S.H. Hosseini. 2014. Verification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental data. Water and environment journal, 28(1): 124-134. [
DOI:10.1111/wej.12019]
11. Kuhnle, R.A., C.V. Alonso and F.D. Shields. 1999. Geometry of scour holes associated with 90 spur dikes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(9): 972-978. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:9(972)]
12. Maclean, A.G. 1991. Bed shear stress and scour over bed-type river intake. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(4): 436-451. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:4(436)]
13. Moradinejad, A., A.H. Haghiabi, M. Saneie and H. Yonesi. 2017. Investigating the effect of a skimming wall on controlling the sediment entrance at lateral intakes. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 17(4): 1121-1132. [
DOI:10.2166/ws.2017.007]
14. Moradinejad, A., M. Saneie, A. Ghaderi and S.M.Z. Shahri. 2019. Experimental study of flow pattern and sediment behavior near the intake structures using the spur dike and skimming wall. Applied Water Science, 9(8): 195 p. [
DOI:10.1007/s13201-019-1069-7]
15. Neary, V. and A. Odgaard. 1993. Three‐Dimensional Flow Structure at Open‐Channel Diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(11): 1223-30. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1223)]
16. Neary, V. and A. Odgaard. 1993. Three‐Dimensional Flow Structure at Open‐Channel Diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(11): 1223-30. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1223)]
17. Nayyer, S., S. Farzin, H. Karami and M. Rostami. 2019. A numerical and experimental investigation of the effects of combination of spur dikes in series on a flow field. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 41(6): 256 p. [
DOI:10.1007/s40430-019-1757-0]
18. Nazari, S. and M. Shafai Bejestan. 2010. The effects of intake angle on the discharge and sediment ratio to an intake in a 90 degree convergence bend. Watershed Management Researches Journal.
19. Neary, V.S. and A.J. Odgaard. 1993. Three-dimensional flow structure at open-channel diversions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(11): 1223-1230 pp. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1223)]
20. Neary, V.S., F. Sotiropoulos and A. J. Odgaard. 1999. Three-dimensional numerical model of lateral-intake inflows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(2): 126-140. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:2(126)]
21. Novak, P., A.I.B. Moffat, C. Nalluri and R. Narayanan. 2014. Hydraulic structures. CRC Press.
22. Pourshahbaz, H., S. Abbasi, M. Pandey, J.H. Pu, P. Taghvaei and N. Tofangdar. 2020. Morphology and hydrodynamics numerical simulation around groynes. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, pp. 1-9. [
DOI:10.1080/09715010.2020.1830000]
23. Ramamurthy, A.S. and M.G. Satish. 1988. Division of flow in short open channel branches. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 114(4): 428-438. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:4(428)]
24. Rao, N.L., K. Sridharan and M.Y.A. Baig. 1968. Experimental study of the division of flow in an open channel. In Proc. Conf. Hydr and Fluid Mech., Institution of Engineers, Australia, 139-142 pp.
25. Răzvan, E. 1989. River intakes and diversion dams (Vol. 25). Elsevier.
26. Sajedi, M. and M. Habibi. 2005. Effect of submerged vane on sediment entry prevention in intake. Third National Conference on Erosion and Sediment. Tehran (In Persian).
27. Tabrizi, H., A.H. Haghiabi, M. Saneie and H. Younesi. 2017. Evaluation of spur dike effect on sediment and flow hydraulic of side intakes located on channel bends. Watershed engineering and management, 9(3): 346-359 pp.
28. Yang, J., J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Teng, W. Chen and X. Li. 2019. Experimental research on the maximum backwater height in front of a permeable spur dike in the bend of a spillway chute. Water Supply, 19(6): 1841-1850. [
DOI:10.2166/ws.2019.061]
29. Zahiri, A., J. Gholinejad, A.A. Dehghani. 2019. Prediction of Sediment Transport Capacity in Rivers using Quasi Two-Dimensional Mathematical Model. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 10(19): 142-153 (In Persian). [
DOI:10.29252/jwmr.10.19.142]