Volume 8, Issue 16 (2-2018)                   jwmr 2018, 8(16): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mashari Eshghabad S, Nohegar A, Babaeian I, Ershadi C. Evaluating a Continuous Hydrological Model’s Ability to Simulate Peak Flows with Short Time Step (Case Study: Zoshk Basin-Mashhad) . jwmr. 2018; 8 (16) :1-10
URL: http://jwmr.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-899-en.html
Abstract:   (1885 Views)
Study on natural processes related to water as well as knowledge about runoff and hydrological conditions is necessary for improvement of water management in Iran. Since most of watersheds in Iran are ungauged, so using hydrologic models to simulate the runoff is inevitable. In this study, continuous distributed hydrologic model WetSpa was used to simulate Zoshk watershed runoff. Three basic maps including digital elevation model (DEM), landuse and soil texture are the model inputs. Required meteorological data are potential evapotranspiration, precipitation and temperature. The basin outlet discharge in Zoahk gauging station is used to calibrate and evaluate the model. Calibration period is from 2009/01/01 to 2011/31/12 and validation period is from 2012/01/01 to 2014/31/12. PEST software was used to calibrate the model parameter. Results show good agreement between calculated and measured hydrographs. The model predicts the hourly hydrographs with a good accuracy, so that according to the Nash-Sutcliff criterion the accuracy is more than 85% and 83% for calibration and validation periods, respectively. The result shows that this model only simulates the high flows well and the simulation result is not appropriate for low flows. This is due to the use of river flow for dry season irrigation.
Full-Text [PDF 1279 kb]   (706 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/01/29 | Revised: 2018/02/25 | Accepted: 2018/01/29 | Published: 2018/01/29

1. Azinmehr, M., Bahremand, A and A. Kabir. 2016. Parameter Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Model WetSpa in the Flow Hydrograph Simulation Using PEST, in Dinvar Basin, Karkheh. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7 (13): 72-82. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jwmr.7.13.82]
2. Bahremand, A., J. Corluy, Y.B., Liu and F. De Smedt. 2005. Stream flow simulation by WetSpa model in Hornad river basin, Slovakia, floods, from Defence to management edited by van Alphen, van Beek and Taal. Taylor- Francis Group, London. pp: 67-74.
3. Bahremand, A., F. De Smedt, J. Corluy, Y.B. Liu, J. Poorova, L. Velcinicka and E. Kunikova. 2007. WetSpa Model Application for Assessing Reforestation Impacts on Floods in Margecany-Hornad Watershed, Slovakia, Water Resource Management, 21:1373-1391. [DOI:10.1007/s11269-006-9089-0]
4. Berezowski, T., J. Chormanski, O. Batelaan, F. Canters and T. Van de Voorde. 2012. Impact of remotely sensed land-cover proportions on urban runoff prediction. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 16: 54-65. [DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2011.11.007]
5. Chormanski, J. and O. Batelaan. 2011. Application of the WetSpa distributed hydrological model for catchment with significant contribution of organic soil. Upper Biebrza case study. Land Reclamation, 43 (1): 25-35. [DOI:10.2478/v10060-008-0090-6]
6. Henderson, F.M. 1966. Open Channel Flow. New York: McMillan. 522 P.
7. Imani, R., Ghasemieh, H and A. E. Ouri. 2016. Application and Calibration of WetSpa Hydrological Model for Daily Runoff Simulation for 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 Water years: A Case Study: Balokhluchay Watershed, Ardabil, and Northwestern Iran. International Bulletein of Water Resource & Development, 3(4), 140-152.
8. Karimi, H., Zeinivand, H., Tahmasebipour, N., Haghizadeh, A and M. Miryaghoubzadeh. 2016. Comparison of SRM and WetSpa models efficiency for snowmelt runoff simulation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75: (664):1-16. [DOI:10.1007/s12665-016-5490-z]
9. Liu, Y.B and F. De Smedt. 2005. Flood Modeling for Complex Terrain Using GIS and Remote Sensed Information, Water Resources Management, 19: 605-624. [DOI:10.1007/s11269-005-6808-x]
10. Liu, Y.B., S. Gebremeskel, F. De Smedt, L. Hoffmann and Pfister, L. 2003. A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 283: 91-106. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00242-7]
11. Moradipour, S., A. Bahremand, H. Zeinivand and Najafinejad, A. 2015. Distributed Simulation of Runoff in Space and Time using Wetspa Model in Taleghan Watershed. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 6 (12): 55-64 (In Persian).
12. Nash, J.E and Sutcliffe, J.V. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10: 282-290. [DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
13. Nyenje, P. M and Batelaan, O. 2009. Estimating the effects of climate change on groundwater recharge and baseflow in the upper Ssezibwa catchment, Uganda. Hydrological Sciences-Journal-des Sciences Hydrologiques, 54(4): 713-726. [DOI:10.1623/hysj.54.4.713]
14. Porretta-Brandyk, L., J. Chormanski, A. Andrzej Brandyk, and Okruszko, T. 2011. Automatic Calibration of the WetSpa Distributed Hydrological Model for Small Lowland Catchments. Geoplanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 43-62. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-19059-9_3]
15. Safari, A., F. De Smedt and Moreda, F. 2012. WetSpa model application in the Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP2). Journal of Hydrology, 418-419: 78-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.001]
16. Safari, A and F. De Smedt, 2014. Improving WetSpa model to predict streamflows for gaged and ungaged catchments. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16: 758-771. [DOI:10.2166/hydro.2013.216]
17. Shafii, M and F. De Smedt. 2009. Multi-objective calibration of a distributed hydrological model (WetSpa) using a genetic algorithm. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 13: 2137-2149. [DOI:10.5194/hess-13-2137-2009]
18. Smakhtin, V.Y., K. Sami and D.A. Hughes. 1998. Evaluating the performance of a deterministic daily rainfall-runoff model in a low flow context. Hydrological Processes, 12: 797-811. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980430)12:5<797::AID-HYP632>3.0.CO;2-S [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980430)12:53.0.CO;2-S]
19. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1998. HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package: User's Manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, and United State. 434pp.
20. Verbeiren, B., T. Van De Voorde, F. Canters, M. Binard, Y. Cornet and O. Batelaan. 2013. Assessing urbanisation effects on rainfall-runoff using a remote sensing supported modelling strategy. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21: 92-102. [DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2012.08.011]
21. Yaghoubi, F and A.R. Bahremand. 2011. Streamflow Simulation using Spatially Distributed Hydrologic Model, WetSpa in Chehel-Chai Watershed in Golestan Province. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 18(3): 185-205 (In Persian).
22. Zeinivand, H. 2014. Evaluation the effect of daily precipitation on runoff in Gharehsou basin in Kermanshah province. Ecohydrology, 2 (1): 143-152 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Watershed Management Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb