Volume 8, Issue 16 (2-2018)                   jwmr 2018, 8(16): 90-99 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

(2018). Optimization of infiltration models coefficients in fields of Haraz extension and technology development center. jwmr. 8(16), 90-99. doi:10.29252/jwmr.8.16.90
URL: http://jwmr.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-906-en.html
Abstract:   (3604 Views)
Quantitation and evaluation of infiltration models are used in soil conservation, irrigation systems, hydrology investigations, watershed and watershed management systems. The purpose of this study was to estimate the infiltration by using statistical and experimental various models in two soils of plowed and without plowed in Haraz Technology and Development center paddy fields of Mazandaran province. The infiltration value was measured by the double rings in plowed and without plowed soils and then was compared with Kostiakov, Kostiakov-Lewis, Philippe, Horton and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) models. The results showed that the final infiltration rate in plowed and not plowed soils were 0.12 and 0.21 cm/min, respectively. The comparison of the estimated infiltration from each of the models with real amounts was done by the average normal root mean square error (NRMSE). The results showed that NRMSE values in plowed and not plowed soils were 21.53 and 6.45 %, respectively. With optimization of models in Solver Excel, amount of NRMSE reduced to 2.48 and 1.9%, respectively. Also according to comparison of infiltration models in both plowed and not plowed soils, the SCS and Kostiakov-Lewis models showed better fits than other models. So that, SCS model for not plowed soil was I=0.8459t1.0417 +0.6985 and for plowed soil was I=0.891t1.026 +0.6985. In general, could be said that fitting of physical and empirical models had good accuracy on Mazandaran paddy fields. Another finding of this study was the better results in the plowed soil based on NRMSE. Therefore, this method can use in paddy fields.
Full-Text [PDF 1157 kb]   (1941 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/01/29 | Revised: 2018/02/25 | Accepted: 2018/01/29 | Published: 2018/01/29

References
1. Abareshi, F., M. Meftah, A. Dehghani and A.R. Kaboli. 2013. Optimization of hydrodynamic coefficients of Zarin Gol plain aquifer by mathematical model. The first Conference of Applied Geology. Damghan University (In Persian).
2. Ahmad A. 1990. Effect of plow sole on soil infiltration rate and crop yield in irrigation soil. J. Agric. Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America Journal, 21: 24-26.
3. Aon, M.A., D.E. Sarena, J.L. Burgos and S. Cortassa. 2001. (Micro) biological, Chemical and physical properties of soils subjected to conventional or no-till management and assessment of their quality status. Soil and Tillage Resource, 60: 173-186. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00190-8]
4. Azmoodeh, A., A. Kavian, K. Soleimani and G. Vahabzadeh. 2010. Comparing Runoff and Soil Erosion in Forest, Dry Farming and Garden Land Uses Soils Using Rainfall Simulator. Journal of Water and Soil, 24(3): 490-500 (In Persian).
5. Benjamin, J.G. 1993. Tillage effect on near surface soil hydraulic properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 26: 277-288. [DOI:10.1016/0167-1987(93)90001-6]
6. Bodhinayake, W., BC. Si and K. Noborio. 2004. Determination of hydraulic properties in sloping landscapes from tension and double-ring infiltrometers. Vadose Zone Journal, 3: 964-970. [DOI:10.2113/3.3.964]
7. Bormann, H and K. Klassen. 2008. Seasonal and land use dependent variability of soil hydrological properties of two northern German soils. Geoderma, 145: 295-302 [DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.017]
8. Bouman, B.A.M., R.M. Lampayan and T.P. Tuong. 2007. Water management in irrigated rice: coping with water scarcity. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp: 1-54.
9. Chen, L., L. Xiang, M. Young, J. Yin, Y. Zhongbo and T. Genuchten. 2015. Optimal parameters for the Green-Ampt infiltration model under rainfall conditions. Journal of HydrologyHydromechanics, 63 (2): 93-101. [DOI:10.1515/johh-2015-0012]
10. Dixon, R.M. 1975. Infiltration control through soil surface management. Proc, ASCE, symp. Watershed management, Utah, St. University, Logan, August, 11-13: 543-567.
11. Dunne, T and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in environmental planning freeman and company.
12. Ebrahimi, K and F. Nayebloei. 2009. Estimation of basic infiltration rate using Artificial Neural Network case study, Aburaihan Campus Farm. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 16(1): 37-57 (In Persian).
13. Ebrahimi, S., H. Bahrami, M. Homaee and M.J. Malakouti. 2004. Effect of organic matter on reducing soil erosion in agricultural land, Publication No. 404, Ministry of Jihad-agriculture. Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
14. Fakher Nikche, A., M. Vafakhah and S. Sadeghi. 2014. Efficiency Evaluation of Different Infiltration Models in Different Land Uses and Soil Classes using Rainfall Simulator. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 24(1): 183-193 (In Persian).
15. Ghorbani Dashtaki, S., M. Homaee and M. Mahdian. 2007. Estimating soil water infiltration parameters using Artificial Neural Networks. Water and Soil Journal, 23(1): 185-198 (In Persian).
16. Ghorbani Dashtaki, S., M. Homaee, MH. Mahdian and M. Kouchakzadeh. 2009. Site-Dependence Performance of Infiltration Models. Water Resource Management, 23: 1573-1650 (In Persian). [DOI:10.1007/s11269-009-9408-3]
17. Girei, A. H., A. Abdulkadir and N. Abdu. 2016. Goodness of fit of three infiltration models of a soilunder long-term trial in Samaru. Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria, 7(5): 64-72. [DOI:10.5897/JSSEM2015.0525]
18. Goodarzi L., A. Akhondi and H. Zarei. 2013. Evaluation and determination of infiltration models in Oshtorian plain. Water and Soil Resources Conservation Journal, 1(3): 39-44 (In Persian).
19. Heydari, A. 2011.Effect of Tillage Methods on Soil Physical Properties and Irrigated Wheat Yield. Isfahan University of Technology, 15(57): 115-124 (In Persian).
20. Kavousi, S. S., M. Vafakhah, and M. H. Mahdian. 2013. Evaluation of Some Infiltration Models for Different Land Uses in Kojour Watershed. Irrigation & Water Engineering, 4(13): 1-13 (In Persian).
21. Licht, M and M. Al-Kaisi. 2012. Less Tillage for More Water in 2013. ISU Extension Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/CropNews/2012/0921lichtal-kaisi.htm.
22. Mahmoodabadi, M and M. R. Mazaheri. 2012. Effect of some soil physical and chemical properties on permeability in field conditions. Journal of Water and Irrigation Engineering, 2 (8): 14-25 (In Persian).
23. Maleki, A., M. Behzad and M. Broumand Nasab. 2004. Determination and Evaluation of infiltration models coefficients in Sugarcane Land. Agriculture, 31: 27-46.
24. Matula, S. 2003. The influence of tillage treatments on water infiltration into soil profile. Plant Soil Environ, 49(7): 298-306 (In Persian). [DOI:10.17221/4128-PSE]
25. Miller, J.J., N.J. Sweetl and F.J. Larnry and K.M. Volkmar. 1998. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of conventional and conservation tillage soil in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal Soil Science, 78: 643-648. [DOI:10.4141/S97-061]
26. Mohammadi, M.H and H. Refahi. 2005. Estimating parameters of infiltration equations using soil physical properties. Journal of Agriculture Science Iran, 36(6): 1391-1398 (In Persian).
27. Neshat, A and M. Parehkar. 2007. The comparison ofmethods for determining the vertical infiltration rate. Journal of Agriculture Science Natural Resources, 14(3): 186-195 (In Persian).
28. Parchami Araghi, F., S.M. Mirlatifi, S. Ghorbani Dashtaki and M.H. Mahdian. 2010. Estimating Cumulative Infiltration Using Artificial Neural Networks in Calcareous Soils. Journal of Water and Soil, 24(3): 512-526 (In Persian).
29. Pitkanen, J and V. Nuutinen. 1998. Earthworm contribution to infiltration and surface runoff after 15 years of different soil management. Applied Soil Ecology, 9: 411- 415. [DOI:10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00098-5]
30. Rasoili Sharbiyani, V. and Y. Abaspour Gilandare. 2008. Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical characteristics. Fifth National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization (In Persian).
31. Rawls, W. J and D. L. Brakenseik. 1985. Prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modeling. In: Jones E. B and Ward, T. J. (Eds). Watershed Management in the Eighties. Proceedings of the Symposium, ASCE Convention in Denver, Colorado, USA.
32. Sadeghi, M., B. Ghahraman, A.N. Ziaei and K. Davary. 2013. Approximate Solutions to Richards' Equation for Soil Water Infiltration Using Scaling. Journal of Water and Soil, 27(3): 525-536 (In Persian).
33. Shaabani Bazneshin, A., A. Emadi and R. Fazloula. 2016. Investigation the Flooding Potential of Basins and Determination Flood Producing Areas (Case Study: NEKA Basin). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7(14): 20-28 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jwmr.7.14.28]
34. Soleimani, L., A. Haghizadeh and H. Zeinivand. 2016. The Determination of the Best Models to Estimate the Infiltration in Various Land uses for Optimum Management of Watersheds (Case Study: Kakasharaf Watershed, Lorestan Province). Journal of Watershed Management Research, 7(13): 33-41(In Persian). [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jwmr.7.13.41]
35. Sy, N.L. 2006. Modelling the infiltration process with a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network. Hydrology Science Journal, 51(1): 3-20. [DOI:10.1623/hysj.51.1.3]
36. Vahedi, S., O. Bahmani, H. Zare Abyanrh and M. Abbasi. 2015. Estimating the final constant infiltration rate with infiltration models and pedotransfer functions. Iran Water Research Journal, 9(4): 9-19 (In Persian).
37. Vahedi, A. A and A. Bijani-nejad. 2015. Variation within soil organic carbon pool in the forest-paddy field edges (Case study: Nour Forest Park). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(1): 104-116.
38. Zare Abyaneh, H., H. Nouri, A. Liyaghat and H. Nouri. 2011. Calibration of Nitrate Leaching and Water Table Fluctuation in Paddy Rice Field by DRAINMOD-N Software. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Science, 15(57): 49-60 (In Persian).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Watershed Management Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb