Volume 9, Issue 17 (9-2018)                   jwmr 2018, 9(17): 168-181 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

javidan N, Bahremand A, javidan R, Onagh M, Komaki C B. Impacts of Land use Changes Scenarios on Water Balance Components using WetSpa Model (Case Study: Ziarat Watershed of Golestan Province) . jwmr. 2018; 9 (17) :168-181
URL: http://jwmr.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-620-en.html
Sary University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
Abstract:   (1220 Views)

Every year, due to population growth and economy development, land uses and land covers are changing. The various types of land uses have significant roles on components of water balance of a watershed. The simulation modeling has the capability to predict floods, to evaluate land use impacts on floods, and to make decision in watershed management. In this research, the effects of land use change scenarios such as current state, deforestation, 100-percent growth of urbanization and the combination of two scenarios (i.e. deforestation+ urbanization) have been evaluated on the water balance using the WetSpa model in the Ziarat watershed, which covers an area of 95.15 km2 and located in Golestan province. In order to execute the WetSpa model, the hourly hydro meteorological data including rainfall, evapotranspiration, temperature, and discharge are used as inputs for a four-year period (from 2007 to 2011). The result of the simulation shows a good agreement between the simulated hydrograph and the observed one. Then, the scenarios of deforestation, urbanization development and the combined scenario of deforestation with urbanization have been designed in GIS environment, and the simulation was performed using the calibrated model. The finding showed there were increases in surface runoff and subsurface flow, groundwater and total flow rates; the maximum change was for runoff rate that increased 5.2 in first scenario to 18 mm in fourth scenario. The decrease of land surface roughness and vegetation canopy lead to decrease in evapotranspiration and leaf interception in the study area.

Full-Text [PDF 5479 kb]   (787 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: هيدرولوژی
Received: 2016/05/5 | Revised: 2018/10/1 | Accepted: 2017/06/12 | Published: 2018/09/26

1. Azinmehr, M. 2010. Simulation of land use change scenarios impacts on flood hydrograph using WetSpa model (Case Study: Dinevar Watershed, Kermanshah Province. M.Sc. Thesis of Watershed Management, Gorgan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Gorgan, Iran, 156 pp (In Persian).
2. Andersen, J., J. Refsgaard and K. Jensen. 2001 .Distributed hydrological modeling of the Senegal River Basin-model construction an validation, Journal of Hydrology, 247: 200-214. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00384-5]
3. Bahremand, A., F. Yaghubi and A. Kabir. 2010. Introduce WetSpa model water and energy transfer between soil, plant and atmosphere, the International Watershed Management Science and Engineering Conference 6 Tarbiat Modarres University, pp: 1-8, Noor, Iran.
4. Bahremand, A. and F. De Smedt. 2010. Predictive analysis and simulation uncertainty of a distributed hydrological model. Water Resouce Management, 2(24): 2869-2880. [DOI:10.1007/s11269-010-9584-1]
5. Bahremand, A. 2007. Simulation the effects of reforestation on floods using spatially distributed hydrologic modelling and GIS, Phd Thesis, Vrij Universiteit, Brussel Belgium, 150 pp (In English).
6. Bahremand, A., F. De Smedt, J. Corluy, Y. Liu, J. Poorova, L. Velcicka and E. Kunikova. 2007. WetSpa model application for assessing reforestation impacts on floods in MargecanyHornad watershed, Slovakia. Water Resource Management, 21: 1373-1391. [DOI:10.1007/s11269-006-9089-0]
7. Bieger, K., B. Schmalz and N. Fohrer. 2010. Modelling the impact of landuse change on the water balace (Case Study: the Xiangxi Catchment). Using SWAT International SWAT Conferece, pp: 2451-2462.
8. De Smedt, F., B. Liu and S. Gebremeskel. 2000. Hydrological modeling on a catchment scale using GIS and remote sensed land use information (Case Study: C.A. Brebbia). Risk Analysis II, WTI press, Boston, pp: 295-304.
9. Doherty, J.E., J.H. Randall and M. Tonkin. 2010. Approaches to highly parameterized inversion-A guide to using PEST for model-parameter and predictive-uncertainty analysis: U.S, Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5211, 71 pp [DOI:10.3133/sir20105211]
10. Elfert, S. and H. Bormann. 2010. Simulated impact of past and possible future land use changes on the hydrological response of the Northern German lowland Hunte catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 383: 245-255. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.040]
11. Fortin, J., R. Turcotte, S. Massicotte, R. Moussa, J. Fitzback and J. Villeneuve. 2001. A Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. I: Description of model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6(2): 91-99. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(91)]
12. Henriksen, H., L. Troldborg, P. Nyegaard, T. Sonnenborg, J. Refsgaard and B. Madsen. 2003. Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark. Journal of Hydrology, 280: 52-71. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00186-0]
13. Liu, Y., S. Gebremeskel, F. De Smedt and L. Pfister. 2003. A Diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modelling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6(283): 91-106. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00242-7]
14. Liu, Y., F. De Smedt, L. Hoffmann and L. Pfister. 2004. Assessing landuse impacts on flood processes in complex terrain by using GIS and modelling approach (Case Study: Luxembourg). Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2(9): 227-235. [DOI:10.1007/s10666-005-0306-7]
15. Mahdavi, M. 2004. A Determination of an Appropriate Monthly Water Balance In Small Watersheds of Iran (Case Study: Eastern Azarbayejan and North of Khorasan). Iranian Journal Natural Resource, 57(3): 415-425.
16. Mango, L., A, Melesse, M. McClain, D. Gann and Sh. Setegn. 2011. Land use and climate change on the hyrology of the upper mara river basin (Case Study: Kenya). Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4(15): 2245-2258. [DOI:10.5194/hess-15-2245-2011]
17. Mohamadi, M., H. Zeinivand, H. Morady, H. Purqasemi and H. Farazjoo. 2016. Impacts of Land Use Changes Scenarios on Runoff generation Using WetSpa Model (Case Study: Baqesalian), Journal of Ecohidrology, 2(4): 357-369.
18. Nash, J. and J.V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1, A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10: 282-290. [DOI:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6]
19. Nzargigloo, S. 2013. Impacts of Land Use Changes of on flood behavior using the WetSpa model (case study: Aharchay Watershed, Azarbaijne SHarqi Province) M.Sc. thesis of Watershed Management, Zabol University, Iran, 86 pp (In Persian).
20. Safari, A., F. De Smedt and F. Moreda. 2012. WetSpa model application in the distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP2). Journal of Hydrology, 418-419, 78-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.001]
21. Turner, B.L., R.H. Moss and D.L. SKole. 1993. Relating Landuse and Global Land-cover Change. A proposal for an IGBP- HDP Core Project Global Change Report. Stokholm. Sweden: 221-223.
22. Thomson, A.M., R.A. Brown, N.J. Rosenberg, R. Srinivasan and R.C. Izaurralde. 2005. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: an integrated assessment. Climate Change, Journal of Hydrology, 69: 67-88. [DOI:10.1007/s10584-005-3610-y]
23. Tavakoli, M., F. De Smedt, T. Vansteenkiste and P. Willems. 2014. Impact of climate change and urban development on extreme flows in the Grote Nete watershed, Belgium. Natural Hazards, 71: 2127-2142. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-013-1001-7]
24. Yari, R. 2011. Analysis of land use change scenarios impacts on runoff coefficient and pitch discharge, the International Watershed Management Science and Engineering Conference 6 Tarbiat Modarres University, 1-8 pp, Noor, Iran.
25. Yaghubi, F. 2010. Simulated river flow using WetSpa models (Case Study: Chehe Chai watershed, Golestan Province), Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 24(3): 185-207.
26. Wang, Z., O. Batelaan and F. De Smedt. 1997. A Distributed model for water and energy transfer between Soil, Plants and Atmosphere (WetSpa). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, (21): 189-193. [DOI:10.1016/S0079-1946(97)85583-8]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Watershed Management Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb